On 28/04/10 05:20 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
On 28/04/2010 12:56, John Levon wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 02:52:59PM -0700, Darren Reed wrote:
With the documentation updated to make it clear that it is
"types of filesystems" that are used with "fs-allowed",
I don't know how I could be more clear.
Agreed, I don't see the problem and I think it is totally clear from
the context and the examples what is intended here.
Ultimately it is upto the man page writers to make sure it is clear,
unless what Darren is suggesting is that 'fs-allowed' is not a
suitable keyword and wants something like 'fs-type-allowed'.
I suppose we're caught between two different uses of the word
"filesystem" :-(
What does the project team think about "fs-type-allowed"?
To me it seems preferable because it means that the keyword is not
dependant on context or a following example to be understood.
Darren
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-arc mailing list
[email protected]
