On 05/20/10 07:03, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
I think this is a good change. But I'd like to see more sample values for the valid values of these properties -- the type of astring is a bit .. hmm... non-specific. (And furthermore, perhaps some of the values should actually take more specifically typed data, e.g. numbers or booleans?
Excellent point, Garrett. I agree that I'd like to see appropriate types defined.
In addition, the project team should please use smf templates (smf_template(5)) if the properly typed values can be further constrained by things like ranges, etc.
liane _______________________________________________ opensolaris-arc mailing list [email protected]
