* Garrett D'Amore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-09 10:10]: > Danek Duvall wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:37:59AM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > > > > > >> Frank Hofmann wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> We are encountering bug 6363369 (cpr_vts fails with "Could not stop > >>>> "ufsreclaim" kernel thread" during suspend) > >>>> > >> If no one at Sun is already working on this, then I can take a look at > >> it. I noted that the bug report indicated "in-progress", so I thought > >> maybe someone was already working on it. > > > > It's in the "accepted" state, which simply means that someone has evaluated > > it sufficiently to say that it's in the right category, and that it likely > > is a bug. I don't know why that's mapping to "in progress" on b.o.o. > > > > There's a fair amount of evaluation and comment in the bug, which I'll let > > the UFS guys extract for you. > > Yes, that would be great. Unfortunately the b.o.o description just says > "see comments", which is rather unhelpful for those of us outside of Sun.
My current thoughts on this (beyond continued admonitions like http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/sch?entry=progress_in_open_development and in related processes) revolve around adding a "is this description useful" feedback mechanism to b.o.o. This mechanism could be used as the basis for the metric raised in http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=11951&tstart=0 by Keith and Alan, in particular. I think that the other approach (of scanning for patterns) isn't likely to work that well--humans being better pattern matching engines, etc. - Stephen -- Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/ _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
