Bonnie, does this mean that if I create a non-debug set of closed
binaries and the file list in the tarball matches what Steve creates for
the debug version, that there should be no issue with me making them
available?
alan.
Bonnie Corwin wrote:
Stephen Lau wrote On 08/22/06 11:09,:
Rich Teer wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Alan Hargreaves wrote:
Oh if only it were that simple. Unfortunately it's not. I've got code working
for producing the bits, I need to keep testing each time a code drop happens
(and I really need to test sparc properly), but other than that it's ready for
code review.
Given that (presumably) the Solaris bits are shipped in non-debug mode,
can you please give us some more details as to why building the open
bits in non-debug mode causes so much grief? I take it that it's not
as simple as just changing an option in a Makefile...
Curiously,
Bonnie - are there any redistribution/licensing issues with building and
distributing non-debug closed-binaries?
No. Licensing a non-debug version of the ON closed-binaries should be
the same as for the debug version.
Thanks.
Bonnie
cheers,
steve
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
--
Alan Hargreaves - http://blogs.sun.com/tpenta
Staff Engineer (Kernel/VOSJEC/Performance)
Systems Technical Service Center
Sun Microsystems
I went in the World's Greatest shave for Leukaemia. See
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/tpenta?entry=hair_yesterday_gone_today
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
