> Correct. But it seems to be a gcc bug. The C-standard allows padding at
> the end of a structure but from my understanding, a structure like
I could be misremembering, but I thought the Solaris ABI prohibits such
padding (not that it does you any good ;-)
>
> struct xxx {
> ...
> type last element;
> char pad[0];
> };
FWIW, my recollection is that C99 requires `char pad[]' in that case,
and that `pad[0]' is a gcc-ism that predates C99.
--
meem
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
