"Bruno Jargot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am going to put my $0.02 here as well.
>
> I think its time that Sun should reconsider whether the Bourne shell
> is still an appropriate choice for a modern operating system like
> Solaris. The current choice is at least substantial portability
> problem for new applications and lacks all features and attributes of
> a modern Unix shell.
> I think it is time that Sun should name a successor (bash or ksh93)
> and work on implementing this.
bash is much worse than the bourne shell (it causes a lot of problems
from it's bugs).
As long as people consider to use bash, I cannot see a problem with the
Bourne shell.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
