Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Plocher wrote:
> > Roland Mainz wrote:
> > > Michael Shapiro wrote:
> > ... lots ...
> >
> > I just don't see the "why" here.
> >
> > Sure, one /could/ do all sorts of spiffy things at build time iff one
> > could just use ksh93.
> >
> > But, I don't see anything in the ON tree today that /requires/ the use
> > of ksh93.
>
> Erm, the problem we have is that all new Makefiles in the
> ksh93-integration prototype004 tree use SHELL=/bin/ksh to simplify some
If you take your ideas of being as POSIX compliant as possible, you should
not put SHELL=/bin/ksh into a Makefile as it makes the makefile non-portable.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
