>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> One more thing: I managed to reproduce the issue using "gld" on build 66; >> so I think the ball now squarely rests in ld.so.1's court; I filed: >> >> 6569636 As of build 62, Solaris no longer runs gld linked executables >> >> Casper >> _______________________________________________ >> opensolaris-code mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code > >This should have already been fixed in build 67 with: > >6565476 rtld symbol version check prevents GNU ld binary from running
Yes, it is, and I neglected to check the very latest (as of monday) fixes. So it's a regression and we fixed it. Please remember that for software problems we prefer to have the symptoms and not the diagnosis; when somebody claims "ABI changes" we are likely to give a knee-jerk "we don't do that" reaction. But if you tell us "my binary no longer runs as of build <mumble>", we are likely to take a bit keener interest. (This time we translated it back to that bit and analyzed it from that end) Casper _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
