Joerg Schilling wrote: > Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Joerg Schilling wrote: >>>> Looks like something in hsfs module is not efficient... >>> If you like to run tests, please start with a halfway recent hsfs, e.g.: >>> >>> ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily/kernel/hsfs/ >>> >>> It seems that you have some ideas why hsfs is slow but you did not name them >>> explicitely. Could you give us more information? >> There really is no point in telling people trying to diagnose a problem >> in the existing ONNV delivered OpenSolaris hsfs module to use your >> version instead. That doesn't get the bugs or performance problems in >> the OpenSolaris one fixed. > > Please do not send useless rants.
> I poinTed him the the most recent code - please get yourself informed! That link is just a tar file. There is no indication at all that is an updated version of the code already in ONNV. So I had to make an assumption, and given it was you the assumption is that it is a schily version since you have produced alternate and portable versions of many things and often point people to your alternate versions. I'd happily be informed but a pointer to a tar file alone with no additional info on what to expect isn't useful. Maybe a simple readme on that page would help rather than just a tar file. Glad to see you are working on improving the hsfs in OpenSolaris, thanks. -- Darren J Moffat _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
