Robin du wrote: > On 10/10/07, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Robin du wrote: >>> On 10/10/07, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Robin du wrote: >>>>> HI list, >>>>> >>>>> If I just want to build the kernel image for intel x64 machine only and >>>>> upgrade the system. >>>>> What is the best way? I mean I want to get the shortest the building >>>>> time,not building SUN sparc staff. >>>> When you build the kernel (or any of ON for that matter) you always only >>>> build x86 or sparc since there is no cross compilation support. The >>>> makefiles are setup to only build the binaries relevant for each >>>> architecture. >>> My steps as follows: >>> >>> 1) #cd $(SRC)/uts >>> 2) dmake all >>> 3) make install >> Instead of dmake all ; make install you can just do: >> >> dmake install > > Do you mean "dmake install" including both build and install two process?
Yes, "install" depends on "all" so it will do "all" first then "install". > This is based on the change and it only works when the change is about a > module. > If the change doesn't belong to any modulename. The whole uts folder > needs to build again, doesn't it? Depends what you are changing, if you say what it is I might be able to give you more hints. >>> Hmm..., I thought Cap-Eye-Install is safer than BFU, because it >>> doesn't overwrite the current kernel image. Why BFU is recommended? >>> any known issue about Cap-Eye-Install? >> Cap-Eye-Install doesn't real with changes that impact the user/kernel >> boundary nor does it do what the bfu acr tool does. > > Sorry, you have to explain what the bfu acr tool does, ;-). Resolves conflicts in critical system files by using the same methods as the packages. For example driver_aliases, minor_perm, etc etc. -- Darren J Moffat _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
