James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see no problem with making it easy to get "all" of the source and
> making sure that people working on vi (for instance) can immediately
> look at and enjoy the libc code, but that doesn't necessarily mean
> that vi and libc need to be (or should be) managed as a single unit of
> code.
This would be a modular approach.
The problem with the current set of ON sources is that it is based on on
modular thoughts but based on "burocracy" rules. This is e.g. causing the
need to have "flag days". If we change things at all, I would first like to
see the ON boundaries moved to have ON contain every source and include file
that is needed to compile ON.
Everything that does not fall under this category may later be a subject for
discussion and become part of a split off.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
