On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Sushant Nirwan wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> I am working on the API(function) of libcontract library libcontract.so.1
>> Testing of the function ct_ctl_newct() and ct_ctl_qack() are always sucess,
>> even when I pass a buggy input to the function it's success.
>>
>> When i go though the source code I come know that the implementation of
>> these two functions are not written.
>> The file from which is I come this conclusion is
>> "..../uts/common/fs/ctfs/ctfs.ctl.c"
>>
>> Can anyone tell me why the implementation of these functions is not written?
>
> But it is:
>
> usr/src/lib/libcontract/common/libcontract.c#200
>
> makes an ioctl call and we end up in:
>
> usr/src/uts/common/fs/ctfs/ctfs_ctl.c#208
>
> 208 case CT_CNEWCT:
> 209 error = contract_newct(ct);
> 210 break;
>
> usr/src/uts/common/os/contract.c#contract_newct
>
> 582 contract_newct(contract_t *ct)
> 583 {
> 584 return (ct->ct_type->ct_type_ops->contop_newct(ct));
> 585 }
>
> That sure looks like an implementation to me. It uses an ops vector
> that is defined here:
>
> usr/src/uts/common/sys/contract_impl.h#204
And the implementation in usr/src/uts/common/contract/process.c is an
"always success" one (returns 0), while the one in
usr/src/uts/common/contract/device.c is an "always fail" one (returns
ENOTSUP). One wonders - what's the point ? Or what does the original
poster attempt to do ?
FrankH.
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
