> i'm afraid i might be damming myself by making this suggestion, > but would using a pre-compiled ksh script solve this problem?
I'm still puzzled by the whole need to replace `sleep' with a built-in. What was wrong with `sleep' as a C program? The purpose in life of sleep is to do nothing for a specified period of time; why does the performance of it matter? >From where I sit, it seems this transition has already cost us too much. Maybe it's time to re-evaluate. -- meem _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
