> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >Recently we hit a problem with one of our file
> systems where 2 kernel threads were killed holding 
> a kmutex. Due to this all the applications which use
> the fs blocked waiting for the kmutex.
> >
> >I am wondering why there is no synchronization type
> equivalent to USYNC_PROCESS_ROBUST (which esse
> ntially releases the pthread_mutex if the owner dies)
> for kmutex. 
> >I am sure many must have had this kind of problem,
> will there be any issue if the mutex held by a 
> dead thread be released after some time?
> 
> kthreads don't die; if a mutex is held forever,
> there's a bug.
> 
> 
> You need to break out mdb/kmdb and find out who holds
> the lock.
> 

Its actually the user thread that got killed but the corresponding kthread held 
the mutex for ever.

Ramana
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code

Reply via email to