> Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:28:01 +0100
> From: Erik Trauschke <erik.trausc...@freenet.de>
> Subject: Re: [osol-code] Behavior of sigtimedwait()
> To: "Roger A. Faulkner" <roger.faulk...@sun.com>
> Cc: opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
> X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
> X-purgate-ID: 149285::1246609805-000079E1-C34F23F2/0-0/0-0
> X-Antispam: No, score=0.0/5.0, scanned in 0.351sec at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 
by smf-spamd v1.3.1 - http://smfs.sf.net/
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 09:36 -0700, Roger A. Faulkner wrote:
> 
> > I filed this bug report to address the problem:
> > 
> > 6857047 sigwait malfunctions for system-generated SIGCHLD signals
> > 
> > I expect to have it fixed soon, build snv_119 (or snv_120 at worst).
> 
> Thanks, that would help us a lot.
> 
> Erik

Hi Erik.

The bug has been fixed, in build snv_119.

Roger Faulkner
Sun Microsystems

_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code

Reply via email to