> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > >> Now that Sun has made official moves to de-support certain hardware (and >> to be >> fair this is not new ... for example some people have wanted UltraSPARC >> 1 >> support for a while now, but now it will be expanded to all SPARC >> workstations >> other than U25 and U45), it seems like it might be a good idea if we had >> a >> "community supported hardware" group and perhaps a dedicated code base. > > I think this is a fantastic idea! > >> * call it CSHW (community supported hardware) for now (other names?) > > I can see the arguments looming now: what's better, CSHW, SHW, BASHW, > ZSHW, > or KSHW? :-) > > -- > Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
Rich, I have learned that some people love to fight and argue even when there is nothing to argue over *and* they have a solution in hand, given to them. So I say we just keep releasing solutions and work forwards entirely ignoring the arguments over which free solution is better than the other. Summary : just do it and keep doing it anyways -- Dennis Clarke dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris dcla...@blastwave.org <- Email related to open source for Solaris _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
