Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersm...@sun.com> wrote:
> James Carlson wrote:
> > I think that might be nasty enough to warrant backing down from 129 ...
>
> Is it new in 129? The amd64 version of strcpy.s was updated to use SSE
> functions in 125, which would seem the most likely place to have introduced
> a change.
>
> http://src.opensolaris.org/source/history/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/lib/libc/amd64/gen/strcpy.s
As I did have massive problems with general usability on my Lenovo X61, the
last
version I did use for a longer time was b 117. It did happen after build 117.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
