On 23/04/2010 16:04, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 23/04/2010 15:51, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Any particular reason why the b138 directory looks very incomplete?
Source tar balls are no longer being generated. They aren't needed,
just pull from the onnv-gate repository with the appropriate tag.
This was announced as part of this flag day:
http://static.opensolaris.org/on/flagdays/pages/20100422161952.html
"* nightly(1) no longer generates a source drop tarball - you should
be getting the source with Mercurial (hg clone or hg pull)."
That seems grand.
Should I then assume that the "tonic" labeled BFU ready-to-run tarballs
are gone?
BFU itself will be going way really soon so if they aren't gone already
then they will be. The acr(1) part of BFU is already gone.
As was mentioned at the start of build 136 in this flag day:
http://static.opensolaris.org/on/flagdays/pages/20100302184109.html
> Those lovely non-debug tarballs are also gone?
I don't which non-debug tarballs you are referring to so I don't know
how to answer that, can you be more specific. Do you maybe mean the
closed-bins non-debug tarballs that are only needed when building from
source ?
> That the people
that were doing those lovely community type services have been taken out
into a field and buried?
I don't think you should assume such things no.
--
Darren J Moffat
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
