Gunnar Ritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > - The second sentnce is just in violation with POSIX.
> >
> > POSIX implicit rules are .SUFFIX: rules only a for this reason only have a
> > target that is a concatenation of source and target suffix. There is no
> > prerequisite but only an implicit target and an implicit source.
> >
> > It may be that someone from the GNU folks did like to do something for
> > Sun Pattern matching rules:
> >
> > tp%ts:dp%ds
> > rule
>
> The "%" makes it implementation-defined anyway so where is your point?
If you like to understand the background wou would need to read my last mail.
It may help to read the POSIX make man page in addition.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
