On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 06:14:57PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > The integration process needs to be defined at all. > > Currently I see that some proposals made to this list are taken and > implemented > and other don't even get a reply. > > If the integration process is not well defined, it is highhanded. > > We need an reasy to read proposal that is either structured cleanly top down > or > buttom up. I am sorry, but the text I did see from John needs some polishing > to match this criteria. > > But currently, I don't believe that community driven integration is possible > soon as there already is an aproval for star integration but asking about a > realization did not end up in a useful discussion.
The near-term process is well defined and has been described by John on several occasions. If you want to integrate anything, you should post a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with all the necessary data (patches, BFU archives, test results, etc). This is a discussion list - it should not be surprising that a post here regarding theoretical code integration doesn't result in action. The long-term process is obviously up for discussion, but we have plenty of infrastructure to take community contributions today - Cyril, Juergen, Shawn, and others have already committed code using the existing process. - Eric -- Eric Schrock, Solaris Kernel Development http://blogs.sun.com/eschrock _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
