Thinking about OpenSolaris. It has no use of these packaging systems that aim of multi-platform-OS-binary level modularity compability PMSs.
>From my point of view what's needed in OpenSolaris is something that is >focused on the end user, and the ability customize. I believe that is one of >the biggest reasons of the SRPMs success. This time the focus has to be on >OpenSolaris and its coming distributions. Schillix is the first distribution, >and I don't know which PMS Schillix its meant to support. But we don't want a >mixture of Sun svr4 pkg, rpm, pkgsrc, and all of the others... in each >distribution. About the source part of PMS, RPM is a great alternative. As a developer, administrator and user, this a great system to provide these abilities that is lacking in the SVR4 system today. This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
