On Sep 7, 2005, at 08:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Roy is merely pointing out that "OpenSolaris should be under
GPL" discussions and there derivatives ("CDDL is better than GPL",
"GPL is better than CDDL", "GPL is not free", "CDDL is not free")
are pointless and have no place on opensolaris-discuss because the
license situations is not going to change.\
I find strident and over-assertive language distressing whichever party
is using it. While OpenSolaris will not be switching to GPL any time
for reasons I have articulated on my blog, the CDDL may well be updated
and improved at an indeterminate future point and understanding issues
with it is valuable.
S.
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
