On Tuesday 11 October 2005 02:14 pm, S Destika wrote: > Every statement of mine claiming Linux is faster than Solaris was backed > with specifics (Faster at creating processes, threads, etc. for e.g.) and > numbers - Solaris bug database, SPEC benchmarks proving Linux SMP > scalability is not as bad as what people claimed without numbers. > > Anything without proof, numbers and specifics is FUD. You know now who was > FUDing. > > Ok, enough of this. Looks like all that's going to stop this flamewar is to > say L1nux is teh suck3r Solaris rulez. > > And yes, I fully expected some people will not understand the brick-wall > analogy ;) ! This message posted from opensolaris.org
If it wouldn't be too much, I would like to ask you not to resort to name calling on this list. Several have offered to help and track down problems we have, yet you continue to answer in the above fashion. This is really what invokes folks. I'm not going to step down to your level anymore, if you have something valid, please ask or state it, but let's not resort to name calling based on your opinion. You have made a couple valid points, Sun is aware of it and looking at those points. Nobody has claimed anything is a flamewar or either OS should be "suck3r" (your term???), other than you. I will ask once again. Is there some thing you would like to point out, or something you would like to state, other than to disrupt this community? -- Alan DuBoff - Sun Microsystems Solaris x86 Engineering _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
