I personally blogged about it over the weekend. And I do feel if Sun
goes the route of GPL 3 they will be inhibiting the platform a great deal.
http://rjdohnert.blogspot.com/2006/01/opensolaris-released-under-gpl3.html
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ignacio Marambio Catán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Why is CDDL suddenly no good any more? Why?
Who says it is not? JS's blog talked of the possibility of *additional*
/dual-licencing/ under the GPLv3.
I really fail to see any advantage, if my interpretation of the GPLv3
draft is correct, than the CDDL is compatible with the GPLv3 draft
anyway, maybe someone could explain?
And we should add that the GPLv3 still is not compatible with the rest of Sun
Solaris. For this reason, dual licensing would allow companies to exclude Sun
from being able to use added value from contributors that did chose the GPLv3
instead of the CDDL.
Jörg
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
