Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 2/14/06, Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 12:31 am, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Now we have a drop in communications.
I don't think that is the case at all. It was a legal issue with RealPlayer10,
and it's been taken care of I believe.

What does "RealPlayer10" have to do with OpenSolaris ?

Very little I think.  Unless the code gets released also .. which I doubt.

Or if you want to look at this another way....

Sun has temporarily fallen behind other OpenSolaris derived distros
in releasing its own OpenSolaris derived distro because it included things with legal requirements outside of CDDL :-)

Giving Nextenta, SchilliX, Belenix a chance to release an OpenSolaris based distro/product based on newer source than is available with currently released Solaris Express bits.

See you can spin this anyway you like.  Note that silly word
play by me is all those comments are, quoting them out of context
or making slashdot/osnews/etc stories out of them is not permitted without full attribution and context including this paragraph.

--
Darren J Moffat
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to