Sunil Subrahmanyam wrote:
Hi,

I installed solaris 10 and everything ran fine for a month. I recently upgraded 
memory on the server and when I rebooted, some of the services were put in the 
maintenance mode.

Here is the solaris 10 release info:
bash-3.00# cat /etc/release
Solaris 10 1/06 s10s_u1wos_19a SPARC
Copyright 2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Assembled 07 December 2005


Here is the error during boot up

irvsun12 console login: Mar 2 11:20:42 inetd[230]: Property 'name' of instance 
svc:/network/rpc/rstat:default is missing, inconsistent or invalid
Mar 2 11:20:42 inetd[230]: Invalid configuration for instance 
svc:/network/rpc/rstat:default, placing in maintenance
Mar 2 11:20:42 inetd[230]: Property 'name' of instance 
svc:/network/rpc/rusers:default is missing, inconsistent or invalid
Mar 2 11:20:42 inetd[230]: Invalid configuration for instance 
svc:/network/rpc/rusers:default, placing in maintenance
Mar 2 11:20:43 inetd[230]: Property 'proto' of instance 
svc:/network/telnet:default is missing, inconsistent or invalid
Mar 2 11:20:43 inetd[230]: Invalid configuration for instance 
svc:/network/telnet:default, placing in maintenance
Mar 2 11:20:43 inetd[230]: Property 'name' of instance 
svc:/network/nfs/rquota:default is missing, inconsistent or invalid
Mar 2 11:20:43 inetd[230]: Invalid configuration for instance 
svc:/network/nfs/rquota:default, placing in maintenance
Mar 2 11:20:43 inetd[230]: Property 'proto' of instance 
svc:/network/ftp:default is missing, inconsistent or invalid
Mar 2 11:20:43 inetd[230]: Invalid configuration for instance 
svc:/network/ftp:default, placing in maintenance
Mar 2 11:20:43 inetd[230]: Property 'proto' of instance 
svc:/network/finger:default is missing, inconsistent or invalid
Mar 2 11:20:43 inetd[230]: Invalid configuration for instance 
svc:/network/finger:default, placing in maintenance
Mar 2 11:20:43 inetd[230]: Property 'proto' of instance 
svc:/network/login:rlogin is missing, inconsistent or invalid
Mar 2 11:20:43 inetd[230]: Invalid configuration for instance 
svc:/network/login:rlogin, placing in maintenance
Mar 2 11:20:43 inetd[230]: Property 'proto' of instance 
svc:/network/shell:default is missing, inconsistent or invalid
Mar 2 11:20:43 inetd[230]: Invalid configuration for instance 
svc:/network/shell:default, placing in maintenance
Mar 2 11:20:43 inetd[230]: Property 'proto' of instance 
svc:/application/x11/xfs:default is missing, inconsistent or invalid
Mar 2 11:20:43 inetd[230]: Invalid configuration for instance 
svc:/application/x11/xfs:default, placing in maintenance
Mar 2 11:20:43 inetd[230]: Property 'proto' of instance 
svc:/application/print/rfc1179:default is missing, inconsistent or invalid
Mar 2 11:20:43 inetd[230]: Invalid configuration for instance 
svc:/application/print/rfc1179:default, placing in maintenance

Any help on getting this resolved is appreciated.

Sorry, no help, just another 'me too': I observe the very same symptoms after applying recently a bunch of patches to S10U1/SPARC, only in my case just one service is affected (it certainly was OK and running fine before the upgrade/reboot):

Feb 19 18:12:10 obender inetd[265]: [ID 702911 daemon.error] Property 'name' of instance svc:/site/swat:default is missing, inconsistent or invalid Feb 19 18:12:10 obender inetd[265]: [ID 702911 daemon.error] Property 'proto' of instance svc:/site/swat:default is missing, inconsistent or invalid Feb 19 18:12:10 obender inetd[265]: [ID 702911 daemon.error] Invalid configuration for instance svc:/site/swat:default, placing in maintenance

$ inetadm -l swat
SCOPE    NAME=VALUE
         name="swat"
         endpoint_type="stream"
         proto="tcp"
         isrpc=FALSE
         wait=FALSE
         exec="/usr/sfw/sbin/swat -d 1 -l /var/log/swatlog"
         user="root"
default  bind_addr=""
default  bind_fail_max=-1
default  bind_fail_interval=-1
default  max_con_rate=-1
default  max_copies=-1
default  con_rate_offline=-1
default  failrate_cnt=10
default  failrate_interval=60
default  inherit_env=TRUE
default  tcp_trace=FALSE
default  tcp_wrappers=FALSE

Nobody here actually uses SWAT, so the service failure is sorta totally unimportant, but I'd like to know what's the reason for such an oddity.

--
/ynp
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to