Keith M Wesolowski writes: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:47:26PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > > > That seems broken, but I suppose that's my non-ON point of view, coming > > from consolidations where the engineer marks the bug "fix available" when > > they submit the fix for code review and "integrated" when they putback to > > the master gate. Perhaps ON needs to reconsider how it uses the fields. > > (Of course, having the bugs.o.o website show "Fix in progress" for anything > > from "Bug filed, but being ignored" to "Fixed but not yet integrated" makes > > this doubly hard for external contributors.) > > The ON integration message tells you to optionally mark your bugs Fix > Available as soon as you putback. The gatekeepers mark them Fix > Delivered when the build is closed. So if the first part of that > became mandatory, confusion over open bugs would be substantially > reduced.
Having engineers rather than gatekeepers marking bugs as "integrated," as Alan describes for non-ON gates, seems broken to me. The gatekeepers are the ones who must verify the contents of a release, not the engineers. The "integrated" state is what I think test folks should rely on to determine the content of a build. The "fix in progress" state in bugster can only be set once you have a target _build_. Most people in ON seem to use "fix in progress" to mean "in code review and nearing putback now." -- James Carlson, KISS Network <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
