On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 03:52, Roland Mainz wrote: > Peter Tribble wrote: > > One way I would imagine approaching this would be to allow multiple > > fstypes to be > > specified with -F. This way, I could easily specify what I wanted to > > monitor, > > rather than trying to filter out the stuff I don't want. > > What about simply allowing extended regular expressions for "-F" ? That > should allow some complexity and is more or less backwards-compatible, > too... :-)
Is it that complex that an ERE would help? I was thinking about: df -F ufs,qfs,tmpfs nothing more complex than that. And using the same scheme for other commands that operate on filesystems for consistency, in particular the new fsstat tool, would be helpful too. (For example, shareall and unshareall use this syntax already [although I don't suppose it finds much use].) -- -Peter Tribble L.I.S., University of Hertfordshire - http://www.herts.ac.uk/ http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
