* Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-13 10:16]: > On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Nils Nieuwejaar wrote: > > > On Thu 04/13/06 at 09:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > There are a couple of requests I need to get more specific > > > instructions on. Specifically, unassociated mailing lists are > > > expensive for support (because we hadn't intended to support any > > > other than the top-level ones from the main portal application), and > > > because they don't get easy visibility from the portal. (They would > > > only appear in the Discussions main page.) So, with that in mind, I > > > wanted to get some more detailed information about two requests: > > > > > > 1. Moderated technical alias/Muskoka project. The Muskoka project > > > was approved, and infrastructure is supposed to be in place. > > > Does the moderated technical alias request apply to > > > muskoka-discuss, > > > > It was our intention for muskoka-discuss to fill that specific gap. I will > > let the most recent requestor(s) for a technical alias speak for themselves > > as to whether this is sufficient. > > This is what I had in mind. Sorry for creating confusion. Okay, that's resolved: muskoka-discuss. (And I'll keep thinking about the opensolaris-* closures.)
Takers on #2? - Stephen -- Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/ _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
