I agree about keeping the scope broader (with perhaps sub-discussions more specific? Don't know if this is do-able..). At the same time, I also agree a better name is in order, when I saw "Muskoka" I quit reading previously. I didn't even realize it was simply the technical mailing list, due to the name.
Cheers, David ----- Original Message ----- From: Dan Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, April 17, 2006 2:04 pm Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Re: technical (kernel?) discussion list progress? > On Mon 17 Apr 2006 at 04:55PM, Bart Smaalders wrote: > > Martin Schaffstall wrote: > > > > >Obvious choice would be "SKML", the "Solaris Kernel Mailing List". > > > > That works, and seems somehow familiar. > > > > We've always (well, for the 17+ years I've been here) had > > a kernel mailing list. We could put your idea in first normal > > form and have > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > There are, however, significant areas of both interest and > > technical complexity actually not in the kernel... there > > really is intelligent life on the other side of the trap > > table. Should the mailing list name reflect this? > > The Muskoka Project tells us it is more broad: > > "Anyone is welcome to post content here, provided it is technical in > nature and is relevant to the OpenSolaris community." > > (and I should note to Bart that the primary Sun-internal kernel > list is > mostly defunct at this point (20 members) and that he isn't on it). > > -dp > > -- > Daniel Price - Solaris Kernel Engineering - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - > blogs.sun.com/dp_______________________________________________ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
