On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 10:24 -0700, Philip Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 07:26:51PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 17:45 -0700, Philip Brown wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:00:28PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 23:46 +0100, Peter Tribble wrote:
> > > > >  - can I request a specific version?
> > > > 
> > > > yes
> > > 
> > > Thats not exactly true. Only if the archive happens to keep old versions,
> > > or if its a "gcc3" vs "gcc4" thing, where people are explicitly packaging
> > > up multiple versions as "current" versions/variants of the software.
> > 
> > nope. it is true. apt-get will ask user to specify particular version
> > if will encounter > 1 version of the same package.
> 
> you actually just agreed with me.
> 
> Note the "if" in your sentence.
> 
> pkg-get does this too, of course: if it finds multiple versions of the
> "same" softwarename on a site, it will ask you which one you actually
> want. Note to others, though; "gcc3" and "gcc4" are technically "different"
> software, from a package management point of view, both from apt-get, and
> pkg-get's view.

yep. you are right.

All I wanted to say is that specific version could be requested *if*
repository has one. There are 2 ways to deliver multiple versions of the
same package: a) via multiple APTs; b) keeping debdelta's at APT. (b) is
actually better option since APT repository could be presented as SCM
with checkpoints, and APT users could upgrade/downgrade to particular
version without need to play around with sources.list and reducing
networking load.

Erast


_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to