Hola!

Live from the annual GNOME conference, here's OpenSolaris Weekly News #17.


Glynn

==

Stephen Lau announced [1] that the new nightlies now contained a mecurial incremental bundle, which should save a significant amount of time on download.

1. 
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-announce/2006-June/000172.html

Alan Coopersmith announced [2] build 43 of X, including some of the headers from
the new X modular releases, and various configuration fixes.

2. 
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-announce/2006-June/000174.html

Laszlo Peter detailed [3] his experience of using the SFW build environment in
updating libxml and libxslt, indicating that the time and work from build to
packaging was significant and thought that it didn't encourage easy 
contribution.
Keith Wesolowski pointed out [4] participation should be a goal, but that quality was a constraint, and the SFW build environment encouraged.

3. http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/sfwnv-discuss/2006-June/000042.html
4. http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/sfwnv-discuss/2006-June/000044.html

Laura Ramsey posted a series of reports [5] from the OpenSolaris anniversary
celebrations.

5. 
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss/2006-June/017878.html

Mark Carlson proposed [6] a new project, NDMP, the porting of the standard 
version
of the Network Data Management Protocol, an open standard protocol for 
network-based
backup.

6. 
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss/2006-June/017899.html

Darren Kenny proposed [7] a project for JDS single system administration, to 
bring
some basic system administration tools to Solaris.

7. 
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss/2006-June/017915.html

Dave Miner posted [8] an update on Solaris installation activities, giving a rough roadmap for the next 3-6 months.

8. http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/install-discuss/2006-June/000463.html
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to