On 6/28/06, ken mays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 6/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>>
>> >thanks casper! i started with an 05/06 nevada DVD
set (snv_38) and
updated that to snv_41 when
i
>> built from the 20060619 sources. i'm downloading
the JDS
vermillion_43 packages at the moment,
so
>> hopefully with those i'll be as up to date as the
nevada version of
S10 06/06.
>>
>> There's no "Nevada version of S10 06/06"; S10 06/06
is just the
release
>> vehicle of S10 updates; evertyhing which is in S10
updates is in
>> Solaris Nevada (or SunOS 5.11/Solaris 11) months
before it's in S10.
>>
>> snv_41 already has vermillion 43 (GNOME 2.14)
>
>Indeed ? Hm, I thought vermillion_43 is what went
into snv_43 together
>with onnv_43
>and others. Am I wrong ?
I think there was some build divergence there.
Certainly there is little point in downloading _43
relative to what's
in _41.
Casper
--------------------------
Cyril,
Ken,
Check to see if Evince 0.5.3 is in SXCR b41 since that
is what is in the JDS Vermillion 43 build (current).
I do not have snv_41, but my snv_42a has evince 0.5.2.
That said I'd expect Vermillion 43 to appear in snv_43.
Few, however, will notice the difference, IMHO.
SXCR b43 has the openssl and CPU SMP updates.
Was SXCR b43 released already ? Following the schedule
I would think it'll be published on July 7.
Having SXCR b42a and higher is your best bet for a lot
of the current efforts. Solaris 10u2 is best for 'new'
build systems and mission-critical production and data
center usage.
Yeah.
The question is if we'll get JDS/GNOME 2.14.x in the
next Solaris 10u3 update (or sooner).
Ken Mays
--
Regards,
Cyril
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
