Dave Marquardt wrote:
"Steve" == Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> The initial leaders will be:
Steve> mjnelson (Mark J. Nelson)
Steve> dduvall (Danek Duvall)
Steve> dm120769 (Dave Marker)
Steve> petede (Pete Dennis)
Steve> stevel (Stephen Lau)
Steve> garypen (Gary Pennington)
Let me ask a process question here. This is the second proposed
project I've seen in a week that has had more than 1 or 2 leaders.
What is it about the way we set up projects in OpenSolaris that causes
us to want more than 1 or 2 leaders? Is it something structural?
When we have so many leaders, I begin to wonder who's left to follow
the leaders. Thanks.
My rationale for the leaders were the engineers on the ONNV C-team:
Tech lead (mjnelson), & assistant tech lead (petede)
Gatekeeper (dduvall) & assistant gatekeeper (dm120769)
+ two engineers from the tonic/opensolaris i-team who have been working
on SCM related issues: myself and garypen.
Since this project will involve a fair bit of work between the two
teams, it made sense to have representatives from both teams - and
having two of each representative (tech lead, gatekeeper, and SCM) made
sense in case one was gone for vacation or something.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
