Rich Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No disrespect to Jörg, but FWIW I wholeheartedly concur. (I really don't
> like the -longoptionname nomenclature, as used by find(1)).
This is really strange, so you like the hard to memorize options from cdrw?
Well, it does not support many of them.... tell me how you would design a
program that supports nearly 100 options without using long options.
Tell me how you would design a program like star that supports more than 170
options?
> Perhaps what we could do is make cdrw report errors more accurately,
> in the way cdrecord (apparently) does.
cdrw ignores most error conditions, this is differeent from not reporting them.
Guess why cdrw seemed to "work" after Sun did introduce the DMA residual count
bug in Solaris 9.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
