"Mika Borner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >There is a campaign against the CDDL and I don't know who's behind that
> campaign.
>
> Not sure...
>
> >A week ago, I did enhance the amount of information about the CDDL
> >on wikipedia and yesterday, this additional information has been
> removed.
>
> From my point of view, all the important information is still there.
> The entry was just fixed, to not sound like a religious war. IMHO if you
Did you really look at the differences?
They removed the information about the fact that the CDDL has been selected as
one of 9 preferred licenses and they removed a hint on a link that is just a
collection of all false claims on the CDDL.
As long as there is 10 times as much "information" on the GPL that is totally
biased, I cannot see wipipedia as neutral in this case.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
