> It would be nice if such a thing would be possible; I think we > certainlyshould expound the CDDL FAQ some, specifically those > points which are > seen controversial.
I was meaning something to specifically address the issues that are being put forth right now. Not a general CDDL defense paper. That would, of course, take much more than a page or two. It probably WOULD be a wise thing to work on, as well. > None of the controversy seems to be backed with legal opinions; > the majority of the argument seems to be "I can read, therefor I can > read law". When you are dealing with the equivilant of modern day hippies, this should be the expected mode of operation. There really isn't much "argument" at all, except for the people who are riding these waves as surfers, throwing punches and kicking for the heck of it. Basically, a VERY vocal minority and a very non-caring majority. This is why a simple, blunt, and non-offensive/non-antagonistic rebuttle to her *specific* claims that is absolutely based on and representative of fact - released in a quiet fashion, would be ideal. David _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
