> Sure; I've seen such a thing done before. However, > it doesn't work > with the objects in question and, even if it did, it > turns out that we > can't put much more here than "sorry, but source for > this module isn't > and can't be made available." > > ... which turns out to be exactly the same thing > we've been saying all > along. > > In other words, if you want the answer as to what the > specific > restriction might be, I'm afraid we can't divulge > that, and even if we > could, it likely would do you no amount of good. > "Can't" is all we > an say. >
True, and I think we all understand this perfectly well. In the example I cited, [b]NONE[/b] of the source code was publicly available, but [b]EVERY[/b] binary licensee saw that if they knew how to read a dump. That comment of mine was an academic aside that I probably should have saved for a less emotionally-charged thread :-) The bottom line is yes, say what you said, but just do it timely, when competent people who are volunteering their valuable time are trying to support us. This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
