Nothing new, ask Rainer Orth.
I also integrated his patch into marTux_0.2 sparc edition and it boots
also on Ultra-1 workstations, not just on U2 with U1-cpu.




UNIX admin wrote:

>...Or perhaps this thread would have better been titled 
>"Voodoo-hoodoo-what-you-don't-dare-do-people".
>
>Anyways, I got an Ultra2 with a 200 MHz UltraSPARC I to boot and install 
>Solaris 10 6/06. To do this, I used a Solaris 10 modified boot server and 
>chose "Manual reboot".
>
>The modification to the net boot image consisted of the `inetboot` copied from 
>Solaris 9 9/05 SPARC.
>
>Then I installed a Solaris 10 (unmodified) Flash(TM) archive to install the 
>system. After the install had completed, I was given a root shell, in which I 
>promptly mounted /export/install on the install server via NFS, and copied 
>Solaris 9 9/05 /platform/sun4u/ufsboot as well as /platform/sun4u/boot.conf.
>Furthermore, by uncommenting
>
>ALLOW_64BIT_KERNEL_ON_UltraSPARC_1_CPU=true
>
>in the /a/platform/sun4u/boot.conf file enabled me to reboot the system in 
>64-bit mode.
>Applying the recommended patch cluster also succeded without a hitch, meaning 
>the system was able to reboot afterwards without a problem.
>
>I also performed
>
>removef /platform/sun4u/ufsboot SUNWcakr
>removef -f SUNWcakr
>
>...because I'm planning on creating my own (patch?) package with `ufsboot` and 
>boot.conf taken from Solaris 9 and I want everything to be spic-and-span clean 
>as far as OS integrity. I hold having to alter SUNWcakr for most unfortunate, 
>since it is one of the core OS packages and I don't know how `patchadd` might 
>behave when trying to patch SUNWcakr with a new `ufsboot` payload and another 
>non-Sun package owns the file.
>
>The only "error" message, if it could be called that, shows up during boot:
>
>call to undefined service "fstat"
>Can't stat misc/forthdebug stat=1868778 sz=3
>
>Am I in a position to fix it, and if so, how do I do that?
>
>I know that there is an RFE out to integrate US I support back into 
>(Open)Solaris, but I don't remember the RFE # any more. Can anybody say how 
>that RFE is coming along?
>
>I should add that being able to make an old UltraSPARC I saved me a whole 
>bunch of money on something that is very hard to get where I am, and very, 
>very rarely available for sale, namely 2 x 450MHz US II modules. So it is 
>quite important that I'm able to run Solaris 10 on an Ultra2 that I can't get 
>rid of because nobody even knows what a Sun system is around here.
>
>And, as a parting note, something for a hardcore Sun/Solaris/Ultra2 enthusiast 
>to feast their eyes on:
>
>Sun Ultra 2 UPA/SBus (UltraSPARC 200MHz), No Keyboard
>OpenBoot 3.25, 256 MB memory installed, Serial ########.
>Ethernet address 8:0:20:##:##:##, Host ID: ########.
>
>
>
>Rebooting with command: boot                                          
>Boot device: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/SUNW,[EMAIL PROTECTED],8800000/[EMAIL 
>PROTECTED],0:a  File and args: 
>SunOS Release 5.10 Version Generic_118833-24 64-bit
>Copyright 1983-2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
>Use is subject to license terms.
>call to undefined service "fstat"
>Can't stat misc/forthdebug stat=1868778 sz=3
>Hostname: host
>
>host console login: root
>Password: 
>Oct 22 22:04:55 host login: ROOT LOGIN /dev/console
>Last login: Sun Oct 22 21:24:05 on console
>Sun Microsystems Inc.   SunOS 5.10      Generic January 2005
># exec tcsh -l
>
>TERM has been set to 'sun'
>
>Sun Microsystems Inc.   SunOS 5.10      Generic January 2005
> 10:04pm  up 7 min(s),  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.15, 0.12
>User     tty           login@  idle   JCPU   PCPU  what
>root     console      10:04pm                      tcsh -l
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]/]> prtdiag -v | less -seM
>System Configuration:  Sun Microsystems  sun4u Sun Ultra 2 UPA/SBus 
>(UltraSPARC 200MHz)
>System clock frequency: 100 MHz
>Memory size: 256 Megabytes
>
>========================= CPUs =========================
>
>                    Run   Ecache   CPU    CPU
>Brd  CPU   Module   MHz     MB    Impl.   Mask
> 0     0     0      200     1.0   US-I     4.0
> 
> 
>This message posted from opensolaris.org
>_______________________________________________
>opensolaris-discuss mailing list
>[email protected]
>
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to