Felix Schulte wrote:
On 31 Oct 2006 11:59:59 -0500 (EST), Dave Morano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Stephan Titard wrote:
> on cygwin, ksh93r does 500 iterations in 1.73s (1.06s with no field
> splitting), pdksh in 2.06s(1.8s) and bash
> in 18.23s(4.7s)
> on HP-UX 11.00 the system ksh (Version 11/16/88) runs about 10 times
> slower than ksh93p+
> exhibiting non-linear behavior as n increases...(seems it does leak
too)
> on solaris 5.8 the system ksh (88f) starts leaking badly and dumps
core...
Wow! :-)
The leak and core dump on the old Solaris version of KSH-88 is just
another reason to try to get it replaced with KSH-93 as soon as
possible! :-)
Tell that Sun. They are still proud to deliver their broken ksh88 junk
with Solaris and claim that this is in the best interest of their
customers
And what exactly do you bring to the table other than needlessly
cross-posting to unrelated mailing lists and inciting flame wars?
-steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
