> I challenge you to read through my emails again and > point out to me > where I say Solaris is bad, in the way, out of > favour, or not in fashion.
What got me was your statement which basically tries to put as much distance between Sun and Solaris and OpenSolaris. That hit me hard, really, really hard! > My argument to you was to point out to you the > distinction between > OpenSolaris and Solaris. Perhaps I'm dumb. Maybe I have trouble comprehending. But when you tell me that Solaris is Sun's distribution of OpenSolaris and that Solaris and OpenSolaris aren't the same, I just have to start scratching my head... try to put this to the layman, what do you think the reaction will be? > It's not a crusade, it's just plain correctness. Sun > should not control > OpenSolaris. If it does, then we've done this all > wrong. But Steve, nobody ever said anything about control. Not a peep. This is not about control. We've gone off on a tangent discussing the taxonomy. I even clearly stated that the source code is free, and just for the record, I'll even state that it's open, lest someone again take this the wrong way. But who has control has not even been discussed. That's not even an issue. This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
