On Thursday 18 January 2007 19:02, Martin Bochnig wrote: > Martin Bochnig wrote: (MB) > > Stefan Teleman wrote: (ST) > > ST>>At most, you can say that the intersection between KDE e.V. and > ST>>OpenSolaris is not the Null Set, since it contains at least one > known ST>>element. :-) > ST>> > ST>>--Stefan > > > > MB>However, it depends on how the original unequations are > interpreted MB>(they did not come with any further > definitions/assumptions). MB> > MB> :-) > > > Stefan, > > you cannot simply switch back and forth in regard to what you > actually _mean(t)_ by a very incomplete/isolated specific enum of > unequations. What you write at the top is certainly true for two > plain sets, if evaluated without any context (and that's of course > state school level - set theory). > > But if you (indirectly) continue to suggest, I had made a painful > miscalculation, then the following two assumptions must be true:
Martin, I have *no clue* what you are talking about. Can we let this subthread die now ? Thank you. --Stefan -- Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition' KDE e.V. -Monty Python [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
