Hey, Stephen Harpster wrote: > I'm also not asking to replace CDDL. I'm asking if people think it > would be a good idea to dual-license OpenSolaris CDDL code with GPLv3. > Of course that depends on what the final outcome of GPLv3 is, but > assuming it looks close to what it is today, would you like that, not > like that, or not care?
I don't really believe I'm enough of a stakeholder in OpenSolaris (ON) to feel like I have a say in the matter, but what I'd really like to see is a set of scenarios of how this would work - in terms of committing code back, distributing code, and linking to the current closed sources. As a random aside, I'd be worried that dual licensing would attract more people to the code base that we still haven't been able to get to an operational level for non-Sun contributions - perhaps that's a good worry to have, but I'd really like to see serious progress being made before such a move is possible. Glynn _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
