Just got this email...
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jan 31, 2007 8:01 PM
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technical details of permanent failure:
PERM_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state 9): 550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table
----- Original message -----
Received: by 10.66.221.6 with SMTP id t6mr1425644ugg.1170270097449;
Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:01:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.67.16.16 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:01:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:01:37 +0100
From: "Josh Hurst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "S Destika" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Community participation
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 1/31/07, S Destika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree with some of your post, but the rest is
> simply untrue. There are plenty of design and
> implementation discussions. There have been plenty of
> good and bad words exchanged as well about particular
> features, etc. There have been discussions about code
> that sucks and code that does not. You can see a lot
> of this when it comes to ZFS and the ksh93
> integration as examples.
----- Message truncated -----
Josh
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
