Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you mis-read my message or i didn't explain it fully. I do appreciate
> CDDL benefits, I just trying to say there is a theory :-) that
> GPLv3/CDDL dual-license will benefit us even more. Again, dual-licensing
> alone is not enough, but still will be helpful first step.
What should be the benefit from adding a "less free" license to the code?
Could you give concrete examples what problems dual lisensing would
cure?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
