Isn't the fact that after almost 2 years of existence we still considered a minority community with almost zero participation from the outside not a proof that something wrong and needs to be fixed?
In my opinion,yes And if we go to dual-license with GPLv3, isn't we all know that at least we will be blessed by FSF/GNU and others GPLv3 supporters (which could be easily 50% of GNU/Linux community)? Isn't this will give us enough hopes that dual-licensing will be a good thing? Are you sure that the solution is to add a new license? Ok,Its could be right,but is there only one solution,and this solution? Could be some other problems before CDDL? I think,it's very difficult to promote a free community tied up with a corporation.I don't know if its could be everybody thinking but I've a suspect that every outside ask as prerequirements free,open and independence.So,are these defects of CDDL license? In my opinion,no. Giacomo This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
