James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adding a new license to the code allows them to ditch CDDL by choosing
> to adopt GPL alone. If it doesn't allow them to get rid of CDDL, and
> we're actually planning to stop people from doing that (via the lack
> of patent grants?), then it opens us up to accusations of a bait-and-
> switch.
>
> I don't see a winning course here.
See my previous mail about the Urheberrecht.....
... we do not need a dual licensed OpenSolaris. What we need is a clear
statement from Sun that Sun does not see any problem if Linux people would
e.g. take ZFS and port it to Linux.
Let us wait and see that then happens. I am sure that just the way of doing
FUD against OpenSolaris from some people would become different.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
