Simon Phipps wrote:

On Feb 3, 2007, at 07:49, Ben Rockwood wrote:
This is neither the first nor the last time this discussion will occur and frankly I don't see it as productive.

You would rather Sun had not asked? Has there previously been a conclusive discussion about GPLv3 (I am aware of the discussions about GPLv2). Do you have evidence that the 18,000 registered on OpenSolaris.org (or at least the Core Contributors) would reject the GPLv3 (or embrace it)? Do you have an alternative method to consult? Would you rather the decision was made secretly? Are governance discussions "unproductive" by definition because they are not about code?[1]

I was not passing judgement on those who've participated in this discussion, simply answered the "Why there 800 people on this list and only 15 posting" question from my perspective. Others may agree, others might not.

As for whether or not governance discussions are productive or not... they are so long as they lead to completion of governance. Once governance is complete and a new OGB is in place we begin work on things that are more interesting, namely refining and honing the development processes. That work can't be completed until the framework of the project is hardened.

And may I point out, that while ~15 people are making most of the comments on this thread, less than that are involved in governance.

What proposal would you make for getting people here to take their governance responsibilities seriously? It seems people are happy to hack, but when it comes to running the place (that governance, this GPLV3 decision) they would rather leave it to others.

Whether or not people care about governance is a personal opinion, people may feel as they wish. I think more people would care if they understood the purpose and direction of the project and how governance fits into that. This goes back to the old discussions on whether the OGB has enforcable power or not, whether or not Sun Executives can over-ride the OGB or not, etc.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I've not yet seen anyone approach the OGB for an opinion on these GPLv3 issues. That says something to me. Many of these fears of which you speak are, I think, out of a sense that no one is running the show... and that means that Sun Microsystems Inc (the faceless entity) is in control, not the OGB or engineers or people with faces regardless of who they work for.

I personally don't worry so much because I happen to know who makes the decisions. I know that its real people, not some faceless entity. I'm sure lots of people don't have that luxury and are concerned.

Just a possibility.

benr.
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to