> However, as for starting with all of closed bins, as > I mentioned in the initial proposal, libc_i18n.a > comes first.
Actually,if you want this to be about community, then let people scratch their own itch. Some may want to work on libc_i18n.a first, someone else may want to work on some other thing first. I will reiterate that the project should be for everything listed on the no_source page (and everything in closed_bins). > That bit *MUST* be reimplemented & > shoved in to ON as fast as possible. *should* be, yes. I certainly hope that it will be the thing people want to contribute to first, but there is no reason someone can't start on something else if they want to and it should be able to be done within this proposed project. > The rest is not > as important in as far as you can, theoretically, > build a mostly working opensolaris distro without > them. Everything has a particular thing that is important to them. From a technical standpoint, I would agree with you, but the project should be all inclusive. > The reason why I posted a libc_i18n rewrite is > because I don't want to have that finished, waiting > for the rest of the emancipation project to finish > before getting it in to ON. As soon as libc_i18n is > done, I want it upstreamed I don't think it has to work that way. A project can have milestones and it doesn't have to wait for all of the components to be finished to be integrated (as far as I know, someone please correct me if I'm wrong) or to begin integration. Besides, someone may want to work on the SPARC disassembler before libc_18n.a and to some people that's just as important (necessary anyway on SPARC for the libc_18n.a re-implementation). -Shawn This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
