>The fact is that Teamware had been EOL'd by Sun before OpenSolaris >started - see http://docs.sun.com/source/816-7532/relnote40.html, >"Removal of Features", and it was well recognised within the Sun Solaris >community that we needed to move to something else, and OpenSolaris >moved the switch up the priority list. Although Teamware was included >in the SCM evaluation, it failed to meet the required criteria and was >therefore discarded. In my opinion, that doesn't equate to "The result >was fixed by Sun before the discussion started".
Specifically because it would have been *much* cheaper for Sun to sstick to teamware, even if it meant developers had to jump through strange hoops. Casper _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
